______________________
John
Pickernell
Assistant Board
Secretary
416-440-7605
Fax:
416-440-7656
Website: www.oeb.gov.on.ca
Official
Correspondence: BoardSec@oeb.gov.on.ca
Address:
2300 Yonge Street 27th
Floor
M4P
1E4
______________________
From:
Aristides49@aol.com [mailto:Aristides49@aol.com]
Sent: February 19, 2008 11:57
PM
To:
Cc: mdekens@rossfirm.com;
glen.e.macdonald@hydroone.com; gnettleton@osler.com; nmacdonald@osler.com;
alex@monem.ca; angela_avery@transcanada.com; angus-one@sympatico.ca;
apape@pstlaw.ca; awellenreiter@wellenreiter.ca; b.lawton@sympatico.ca;
bakerauctions@hurontel.on.ca; bandasmith@sympatico.ca; barbarawatt@sympatico.ca;
basil.alexander@klippensteins.ca; bkidane@era-inc.ca; bmlzeinstra@wightman.ca;
bonnie.adams@enbridge.com; brian.armstrong@brucepower.com;
brian@moonstarlodge.com; brigadoonfarm@gmail.com; broadley@vaxxine.com;
bruceview@sympatico.ca; bulltel@on.aibn.com; campbelltrans@xplornet.com;
carl.burrell@ieso.ca; cathy_mccartney2@hotmail.com;
cherry.blackwood@enbridge.com; Cisca.McInnis@ontario.ca;
ckeizer@ogilvyrenault.com; cwatson@town.southgate.on.ca;
d.mclaren@the-matrix.ca; d.woelfle@bmts.com; david.butters@appro.org;
david.gallagher049@sympatico.ca; DavidMacIntosh@nextcity.com;
dclang@sympatico.ca; dianne.miller@bmts.com; dmather@hanover.ca;
dschlissel@synapse-energy.com; durhamvet@bellnet.ca; fallaw@bmts.com;
fsperduti@blgcanada.com; g-ebrown@sympatico.ca; gladyshume@wwdb.org;
GreenGablesGuestHouse@on.aibn.com; gvegh@mccarthy.ca; gzacher@stikeman.com;
hboa@leaderwind.com; hma@bmts.com; isutherland@rogers.com;
Jake.Brooks@appro.org; jason@jtmlaw.ca; jbush@hrca.on.ca;
jgibbons@pollutionprobe.org; jkwik@era-inc.ca; john.rattray@ieso.ca;
jrosengarten@mccarthy.ca; karen.france@sympatico.ca;
kathryn.ironmonger@town.erin.on.ca; kevin@hanoverlaw.ca; lin.ron@sympatico.ca;
lindner@log.on.ca; loretta.arci@gmail.com; lshagan@wightman.ca;
margaret_duzy@transcanada.com; marnpaul@bellnet.ca; marsha_7@sympatico.ca;
mdauria@sympatico.ca; michael.engelberg@hydroOne.com;
Miriam.Heinz@powerauthority.on.ca; morito@primus.ca;
mrothman@navigantconsulting.com; murray.klippenstein@klippensteins.ca;
neil.currie@ofa.on.ca; pddaleent@hurontel.on.ca; petelanz@lanzalotta.com;
peter.bettle@brookfieldpower.com; peter.dailleboust@halton.ca;
peterbbudd@rogers.com; pfaye@rogers.com; pgarvey@bmts.com;
pmcmahon@uniongas.com; pvanderpryt@rogers.com; qmross@rossfirm.com;
r.o.ware@sympatico.ca; r_and_c.cooper@sympatico.ca; ramhill@wightman.ca;
regulatory@hydroone.com; richard.stephenson@paliareroland.com;
rjwilhelm@hsfx.ca; rking@ogilvyrenault.com; ron.collins@enbridge.com;
rtrend@sympatico.ca; sandy_o'connor@transalta.com; sdlenk@bmts.com;
sebasdv@log.on.ca; Shari-Lynn.spratt@enbridge.com; sjince@sympatico.ca;
spracket@pwu.ca; sshaw@uwo.ca; strong@cohenhighley.com; swaque@blgcanada.com;
TCE_Regulatory@transcanada.com; tedbrown@globalserve.net;
tom.brett@gowlings.com; TomAdams@nextcity.com; tony.petrella@opg.com;
tracyr@haltonhillshydro.com; vhartman@canada.com; Virginia@virginiamaclean.com;
walter.wallace@rbc.com; wblake@tributeresources.com; wcohoon@sympatico.ca;
wsopinka@sopinka-kort.com; younker77r@hotmail.com
Subject: Submission regarding Applicant
Evidence and the Timeline
Ms.
Board
Secretary
RR2
P.O. Box
2319 N4L
1W6
Fax:(416)440-7656 February 19,
2008
Email: boardsec@oeb.gov.on.ca
RE:
EB-2007-0050
Dear Ms.
Walli et al:
[The Board, Applicant,
OPA,
VIA
EMAIL
IESO, and Intervenors]
Submission regarding
Applicant Evidence and the Timeline.
Synopsis:
I submit that
there are two pieces of evidence that should have been included in the
Application evidentiary. The one is of foremost importance to this process
and its appropriate course. The other is simply supportive to the first. I
further submit that the introduction of this evidence will require a reasonable
alteration of the schedule.
Not only should the
introduction of this evidence precede the interrogatories, but sufficient time
is required so that this evidence can be addressed in the
interrogatories.
Apparently, the
change in the Application has added new landowners/intervenors to this
process, or so I am told. This and, more importantly, the preceding and the
Applicant's reticence in disclosure and response during the Technical
Conference suggests that we should also revisit the occurrence of a
Technical Conference, also prior to the
Interrogatories.
The
omission of key evidence is a serious matter and requires appropriate
resolution. It is only equitable that this evidence go through the same
process as the other filed evidence, if the Board determines that my submission
on this matter has merit.
Please
find my detailed submission and other supporting documents in the
attachments.
Respectfully.
Chris Aristides
Pappas