_____

From: Michael Buonaguro [mailto:mbuonaguro@piac.ca]
Sent: October 31, 2011 5:23 PM
To: 'Phil Martin'; BoardSec; randy.aiken@sympatico.ca; DavidMacIntosh@nextcity.com; shelley.grice@rogers.com; mgarner@econalysis.ca; wmcnally@opsba.org; 'Jay Shepherd'; 'Sidlofsky, James C.'; Richard Battista; Christie Clark; Fiona O'Connell
Cc: 'Atul Mahajan'; 'David Savage'; 'Denise Flores'
Subject: RE: Oshawa PUC Response to Undertakings (EB-2011-0073)



We have corrected our request as follows:



In reviewing the responses to the Technical Conference questions we note that the revised revenue requirement per the written responses to JT1.1 is $24,054,465. However, the excel RRWF and the excel Cost Allocation models filed both show a revenue requirement of $24,378,026. Could you please advise which of the two revenue requirements OPUCN is correct?



Furthermore, if it is the higher value that is correct could you update the response provided to JT1.6 since it appears to be based on the Cost Allocation associated with the lower revenue requirement.



In reviewing the responses to the Technical Conference questions we note that the revised revenue requirement per the written responses to JT1.1 and JT1.2 is $24,054,465. However, the excel RRWF and the excel Cost Allocation models filed both show a revenue requirement of $24,378,026. Could you please advise which of the two revenue requirements for OPUCN is correct?



Furthermore, if it is the higher value that is correct could you update the response provided to JT1.2 and also to JT1.6



Michael R. Buonaguro

Public Interest Advocacy Centre

34 King Street East, Suite 1102

Toronto, Ontario

M5C 2X8



ph: (416) 767-1666

fax: (416) 348-0641

email: mbuonaguro@piac.ca



From: Phil Martin [mailto:pmartin@opuc.on.ca]
Sent: October-28-11 8:22 PM
To: BoardSec@ontarioenergyboard.ca; randy.aiken@sympatico.ca; DavidMacIntosh@nextcity.com; shelley.grice@rogers.com; mbuonaguro@piac.ca; mgarner@econalysis.ca; wmcnally@opsba.org; Jay Shepherd; Sidlofsky, James C.; Richard Battista; Christie Clark; Fiona O'Connell
Cc: Atul Mahajan; David Savage; Denise Flores
Subject: Oshawa PUC Response to Undertakings (EB-2011-0073)



Dear Ms Walli:



Oshawa has prepared its response to undertakings assigned during the Technical Conference held on October 21st. A copy of this response is attached for your information. Copies have also been sent to the Intervenors of record. Two (2) paper copies of this response will arrive in your office shortly. A copy of this response has also been filed electronically through the RESS system.





Phil Martin

VP Finance & Regulatory Compliance



_____

This message is intended only for the use of the intended recipients, and it may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message from your system.

P Please consider the environment before printing this email.