From: |
BoardSec |
To: |
Batul Rahimtoola |
Cc: |
|
Sent: |
2013-02-07 at 3:10 PM |
Received: |
2013-02-07 at 3:10 PM |
Subject: |
FW: North Bay Hydro Distribution Limited - Delay of 2014 Cost of Service application |
Â
Â
Giovanna J. Dragic
Senior Case Administrator
Legal Services & Board Secretary
Ontario Energy Board
2300 Yonge St., 27th floor
Toronto ON M4P 1E4
Â
Tel:Â Â 416-440-7611
Fax:Â 416-440-7656
Toll Free:Â 1-888-632-6273
Email:Â HYPERLINK "mailto:giovanna.dragic@ontarioenergyboard.ca"giovanna.dragic@ontarioenergyboard.ca
Website: HYPERLINK "http://www.ontarioenergyboard.ca/"www.ontarioenergyboard.ca
Â
Â
From: Don Rennick [mailto:ddrennick@cogeco.ca]
Sent: July 2, 2013 3:43 PM
To: BoardSec
Cc: Melissa Casson
Subject: North Bay Hydro Distribution Limited - Delay of 2014 Cost of Service application
Â
July 2, 2013Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
                                                                                                           VIA E-MAIL
Ms. Kirsten Walli
Board Secretary
Ontario Energy Board
P.O. Box 2319
2300 Yonge St.
Toronto, ONÂ Â M4P 1E4
Â
Dear Ms. Walli:
Re: North Bay Hydro Distribution Limited (NBHDL) request for delay of
May 1, 2014 Cost of Service Application
Â
I have not received a reply to my letter requesting that the OEBâs approval for NBHDL to delay its cost of service application be rescinded.
Â
I believe that the objection contained examples of a number of valid points showing that some items that were contained in the 2010 rate basing year have been paid for by ratepayers and some were simply miscalculated. My suggestion was that ratepayers would benefit greatly from a cost of service application for a 2014 rate rebasing.
Â
The fact that OEB does not scrutinize actual expenditures on individual budgeted expense items after rates have been set does not detract from the impact of the arguments put forward in my objection. The envelope of expenses approved in 2010 has changed significantly and this change will have the effect of reducing current rates.
Â
I continue to believe that the delaying a cost of service application by NBHDL will be a financial burden on ratepayers that will never be recovered and will provide few, if any, financial benefits to ratepayers.
Â
I would appreciate receiving a reply indicating that the approval has been rescinded or in the alternative a reply addressing my concerns.
Â
Yours very truly,
Â
Donald D, Rennick, CPA, CA
392 Surrey Drive
North Bay. On  P1C 1E3
(705) 476-2007
Â